Title: Q1 2022 - Spending Budget
Author: @keeevin
Budget Proposal: BUDGET-001
Budget Summary
This proposal establishes the following budgets for 2022 Q1:
WG | Spending Category | Budget | Description |
---|---|---|---|
Operations | Legal Fees | $45,000 | General legal fees relating to tax, drafting documents, and general legal consultation |
Engineering | Bounties | $10,000 | Bounties for DeWork bounties board for solving Github issues |
Operations | Bounties | $2,000 | Bounties for DeWork bounties board relating to operations tasks |
Budget Details
Fast-tracked Spending
If passed, this proposal will enable spend against the above budgets without a 3-day minimum discussion period (i.e. going directly to Snapshot voting).
The Snapshot proposal would reference this budget proposal (BUDGET-001
).
Budget Rollover
Allocated budgets do not roll over to the next quarter.
For example, if only $6,000 of the $10,000 budget allocated to Engineering Bounties were spent in 2022 Q1, then the remaining $4,000 budget will expire.
Edit: the $4,000 budget would only expire if no one picked up the bounty. If the bounty was picked up, then the expense for the bounty would be applied to the $4,000 budget from Q1.
Excess Spend
Spend is only approved up to the budgeted amount for the quarter. If actual spend exceeds budget, the excess amount will need to be discussed and voted on.
Value Propositions
Discussion on Merits of Proposals
Proposals for spending budgets will give DAO members an opportunity to thoroughly discuss the merits of each spend before it reaches Snapshot voting.
Eventually, all budget line items should have a corresponding issue in GitHub where progress (and remaining budget for each) can be tracked
Improved Forecasting
Spending budgets allow for better predictability on what we’ll spend on and when we’ll spend it.
They’ll also improve our contributor onboarding experience because there will be alignment on the contributors’ deliverables, allowing them to get started working quicker.